White Forum Chambers logo

Case Analysis: Push Payment Fraud

Tower bridge

David McIlroy explores the Supreme Court decision in Singularis Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd [2019] UKSC 50 and considers its implications for Authorised Push Payment Fraud claims.

This case analysis looks at the extent of a bank’s Quincecare duty, the ability to attribute the dishonesty of the controlling mind in a ‘one-man company’ to the company itself, and the voluntary Contingent Reimbursement Model Code for Authorised Push Payment Scams.

You can download David’s case analysis here.

If you require our services in legal areas akin to those considered above, or in any other of our areas of practice and expertise, do not hesitate to get in touch with us by phone, email or contact form below.